It would be far better to replace refereeing with TruthSift
The problem is they currently ignore unexpected events fearing too many false positives
Outside of Quora Thread: An Lushan >100 years before the fall of Tang Dynasty
Factionalism was irrelevant compared to other factors
For an Overview of TruthSift
The peer review process is being targeted by bad actors
The present refereeing system is not preventing vast numbers of fake results from being published
Using Truthsift the referees would be embarrassed if they took many months as often happens now
Using Truthsift the authors could respond Point by point, as could referees
Neuroscientists scanning brain can predict choices 11 Seconds before they are conscious
Because if a statement Is rated TE, every challenge to it or its demonstration has been met with a TE counter challenge like this one
No, because you must post a novel reason you believe is valid when you challenge. The last valid reason wins, as it should.
A statement is Tentatively Established, if at least one of its proofs are TE, and no challenge is.
A tentatively established statement has a demonstration for which every challenge has been refuted.
TruthSift will yield wrong answers