These Studies are Largely Corrupted by the Fact that Almost All Papers Compare Highly Vaccinated Individuals
Evidence shows increased risk of diabetes from Hib vaccine exceeds benefits
This paper presents no evidence whatsoever that the vaccine series is safe
A study comparing vaccinated to unvaccinated homeschoolers found huge damage
Mitkus et Al make numerous other errors including ignoring animal studies showing higher toxicity at lower levels than the one they use and ignoring particulate aluminum
This is not relevant to the question of safety as explicitly defined in the topic statement
Only post statements you believe are valid, except to pedagogically post both statement and its debunking challenge.
TruthSift will lead to wrong answers because anybody can change the result, not just those with degrees and positions
There is a defensible demonstration or the elite have no rational basis. The diagram publishes it, or highlights its non-existence.
Doesn't it just come down to who challenges last then?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"--R.P. Feynman
Any smart person in the world can contribute, pasting his idea right where its relevant. The system immediately highlights its impact.
If this statement is TE, since anybody in the world can post challenges, nobody has a rational argument against it or its demonstration.
Rationality is a property of the demonstration, not the author.
After everybody has made every argument and counter argument they conceive, what remains is a rational analysis of what is understood.