Be more specific please
This paper studies effectiveness against flu. It says nothing about collateral damage.
This is a Vaccine Effectiveness study, which hence assumes no collateral damage not measures it
Only post statements you believe are valid, except to pedagogically post both statement and its debunking challenge.
TruthSift will lead to wrong answers because anybody can change the result, not just those with degrees and positions
There is a defensible demonstration or the elite have no rational basis. The diagram publishes it, or highlights its non-existence.
Doesn't it just come down to who challenges last then?
"Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts"--R.P. Feynman
Any smart person in the world can contribute, pasting his idea right where its relevant. The system immediately highlights its impact.
If this statement is TE, since anybody in the world can post challenges, nobody has a rational argument against it or its demonstration.
Rationality is a property of the demonstration, not the author.
After everybody has made every argument and counter argument they conceive, what remains is a rational analysis of what is understood.
Have edited the topic statement to address point that at any given time, recent challenge could disrupt
They are famously consistent with the rotating earth after special relativity is included
Which experiments refute it?