For topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Reward Name :
Reward Description:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:
The total reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date.

The total reward is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.

Half of the reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date and the other half is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.



Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Rewrd Name :
Reward Description:
Offered By:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:


Conditions:


Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Test string

TOPIC HISTORY

Did the New Deal lift the US out of the Great Depression?



Statements

Statement Type Title Description Proposed Probability Author History Last Updated
STATEMENT The New Deal lifted the US out of the Great Depression

The New Deal Lifted the US out of the Great Depression

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION The WPA employed more than 8.5 million workers who otherwise would have been out of work

Mary Beth Norton et al. (2009). A People and a Nation: A History of the United States. Since 1865. Cengage. p. 669. ISBN 0547175604. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Unemployment Decreased from 25% to 9% in Roosevelt's first term

Broadus Mitchell, Decade: From New Era through New Deal, 1929–1941 (1964) (wikipedia)

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT War Production Lifted the US out of the Great Depression An influx of foreign gold helped increase the monetary base 0.5 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION British spending on war goods in gold expanded the monetary base in the US Hall, Thomas E., and Ferguson, David J. "The Great Depression: An International Disaster of Perverse Economic Policies". Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. 1998. pg 155 (wikipedia) 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Banking Reforms helped stabilize the economy Glass-Steagall Act FDIC insurance 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Bank failures decreased substantially

"This banking reform offered unprecedented stability: While throughout the 1920s more than five hundred banks failed per year; it was less than ten banks per year after 1933." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Increases in the monetary supply pulled the US out of the Great Depression Christina Romer argues that suspending the gold standard and allowing the US Dollar to float freely on foreign exchange markets allowed for a 25% increase in industrial production until 1937, and by 50% until 1942. Romer, Christina, "What ended the Great Depression" 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Living Conditions improved for farmers 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Their average income almost doubled by 1937

Mastering Modern World History by Norman Lowe, second edition, P.117 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT The NRA helped boost industrial production

"By the time the NRA ended in May 1935, industrial production was 55% higher than in May 1933." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Unemployment really dropped from 24.9% to 14.3% at the end of Roosevelt's first term

You cannot count the workers in the WPA and other job creation programs as employed, so the real unemployment rate dropped to 14.3% in 1937 and rose again to 19.0% in 1938. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT The US Reached full employment in December 1941 after entering WW2

Federal Expenditures accounted for only 3% of GNP in 1929, and war spending consumed 40% of GNP in 1944 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Real wages rose 44% in the first 4 years of the war, and the percentage of families with an annual income of <$2000 fell from 75% to 25%

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Deal  119.  America in our time: from World War II to Nixon—what happened and why by Godfrey Hodgson

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Cole and Ohanian at UCLA argue that the New Deal prolonged the Great Depression by 7 years

Cole and Ohanian use BLS statistics to establish average wages and prices in a variety of industries before the crash. They then adjust these for annual increases in productivity to show that prices and wages lagged behind what they would have been in real terms had the New Deal not taken place. Cole and Ohanian specifically blame the lagging economy on wage and price controls undertaken by the Roosevelt administration. They argue that the fixing of prices contributed substantially to the slow recovery. They cite the lack of anti-trust cases taken to court during the years 1932 to 1938. They claim that the economy didn't reach full employment again until 1943. http://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/FDR-s-Policies-Prolonged-Depression-5409?RelNum=5409  http://hlcole.bol.ucla.edu/NewDealucla.pdf 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT The Cole and Ohanian model is flawed. They argue that the time cost of searching for a job in a cartelized industry is the same as that of working full time. That is to say, that no one looks for a better job in an industry in which wages are artificially high while holding down another job. Furthermore, their model counts workers for the WPA and other make-work programs as unemployed. 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Cole and Ohanian address the effects of job search friction in their appendix Even without job search friction, their model still shows output falling by 11%. (pg. 11) 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT WPA wages were lower than private sector wages http://www.socialwelfarehistory.com/organizations/wpa-the-works-progress-administration/ 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION The Federal Reserve kept the US in the Great Depression by not increasing the money supply

Milton Friedman argues that if the fed had made more open-market purchases of bonds to keep the money supply constant that the crisis could have been averted. http://fee.org/freeman/detail/the-great-depression-according-to-milton-friedman 

1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT I wasn't actually the author of this Diagram. I imported it from a tester.--Eric 1.0 Eric Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0