For topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Reward Name :
Reward Description:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:
The total reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date.

The total reward is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.

Half of the reward is divided among all statements that were created during the period after the reward is offered and are established at the payout date and the other half is divided among all save events occurring during the period after the reward is offered that add one or more statements that change the status of the root and are established at the payout date.



Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Rewrd Name :
Reward Description:
Offered By:
Prize:
Closing Date:
Status:

Payout Rules:


Conditions:


Topic:

Reward is a feature that we hope will inspire experts to answer important questions and make their answers available to everyone. It allows a sponsor to signal that they think a question is particularly important by offering a financial prize for established arguments that contribute to the establishment or refutation of the topic. A prize winner can keep the money, apply it to reward other questions, or donate it to charity.

Test string

TOPIC HISTORY

A centralized intelligence agency heading all lower agencies will protect citizens more effectively



Statements

Statement Type Title Description Proposed Probability Author History Last Updated
CITATION Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library, Box 4, Folder COINTELPRO

http://www.fordlibrarymuseum.gov/library/document/0204/1511708.pdf 

1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT A centralized intelligence agency heading all lower agencies will protect citizens more effectively 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Centralization will increase accountability 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Centralization will increase efficiency 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Power in the hands of the few, in the context of intelligence agencies, leads to abuse 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Centralization concentrates power in the hands of too few 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT J. Edgar Hoover directed FBI for 48 years. May have pursued FBI interests over American interests. 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Hoover's fervent Anti-Communism a ploy to increase U.S. support of FBI and FBI surveillance of political activists 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Decentralized power is an enduring fixture of American politics and should remain that way 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Third paragraph of "The Truth about J. Edgar Hoover," TIME Archives 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT COINTELPRO, pushed by Hoover, ignored FBI jurisdiction in attempts to discredit movements to help American citizens 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Having a clear group responsible for national security may allow swifter and more sweeping changes should abuse be found 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Data are managed separately between myriad agencies. Lack of communication dangerous. A head agency may increase communication. 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Past attempts at centralizing intelligence agencies have been unsuccessful 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT The policy-making powers of the leadership of intelligence agencies may be independent of how the agencies are organized 0.8 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Lack of oversight led to perceived abuses such as COINTELPRO. Oversight and centralization need not be mutually incompatible 0.8 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Hypothetical Example: Committee of leaders, appointed and elected, head the proposed central agency, minimizing abuse risk 0.7 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Creation of the Office of Strategic Services and Centralized Intelligence Agency did not lead to increased collaboration or centralization 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Theoharis, Athan. The Quest for Absolute Security. 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Current intelligence agencies will wish to protect their autonomy 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
STATEMENT Individual agencies lean towards classification, which can restrict data sharing in dangerous ways 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0
CITATION Young, Alex. "Too Much Information: Ineffective Intelligence Collection." Harvard International Review. http://hir.harvard.edu/archives/10382 1.0 NickAdams Details 2016-09-28 22:27:34.0